Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T3500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 09KPNV
Memory17.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 16:36
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon W3530-$290
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 138
59% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 213
33% 234 Pts
64-Core 232
16% 232 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 101
Parallax 98.3
84% 101 fps
MRender 93
Gravity 100
Splatting 96.8
80% 96.6 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 77%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
56GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 159 172 170 173 173 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.8% Good
Read 228
Write 230
Mixed 220
SusWrite 165
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 34.3
107% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 196
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$40
120GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 94 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 96
Write 84.9
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 94.2
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 72%
Samsung M3 Station 1TB
805GB free, PID 60f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 16.2
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 19.6
30% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 25.4
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 18
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 16
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23" 1280 720 FUS07FA SL23T-1 LED
Typical Precision WorkStation T3500 Builds (Compare 6,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback