| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Alienware M18xR2 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware M18xR2 |
| Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130131 |
| Uptime | 8 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 26 '17 at 09:27 |
| Run Duration | 100 Seconds |
| Run User | KWT-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.5%
Very good
|
73% 124 Pts
|
47% 376 Pts
|
30% 490 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 680M
Dell(1028 0550) 2GB
CLim: 758 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33
|
32%
Below average
|
38% 32 fps
|
21% 25.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
96.5%
Outstanding
|
137% 619 MB/s
|
93% 38.6 MB/s
|
67% 146 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C12 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 2000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
70.5%
Very good
|
72% 25.4 GB/s
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
66% 60.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M18xR2 Builds (Compare 183 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware M18xR2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 41x |
| Core i7-3840QMIntel $549Bench 66%, 3,981 samples | 29x |
| Core i7-3940XMIntel $344Bench 70%, 2,187 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 680MNvidiaBench 19%, 1,365 samples | 41x |
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 32x |
| GTX 675MNvidiaBench 12%, 994 samples | 26x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| SSDSC2KG038T8R 4TBBench 80%, 26 samples | 11x |
| LMH-256V2M-11 MSATA 256GBLiteonBench 76%, 938 samples | 6x |
| 840 Evo mSATA 1TBSamsungBench 100%, 613 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $420 |