Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Memory 13.2 1-Core 40.2 2-Core 70.3 22% 41.2 Pts	4-Core 65.2 8-Core 73.9 9% 69.6 Pts	64-Core 68.3 4% 68.3 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.57 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTS400S 128GB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 115GB free Firmware: P1225CH1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 111 144 148 152 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 320 Write 155 Mixed 191 SusWrite 139 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 20.4 63% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 108 82% 111 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 1.1 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 375 11% 375 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	11.6"	1280 701	CMN0005 SL116PP40Y100

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16