PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150805 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 28 '21 at 20:46 |
Run Duration | 201 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 276 293 288 296 299 MB/s
|
59.7%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
116GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 96 96 96 101 110 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk SDSSDP128G 126GB
59GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
93GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.6 10 10 10 10 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT51264BD160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 79 | 5 | 60 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | AOC2476 2476WM |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |