| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Empty empty (all builds) |
| Motherboard | |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160907 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 28 '21 at 14:02 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.2%
Average
|
43% 67.7 Pts
|
14% 108 Pts
|
7% 120 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.8%
Poor
|
24% 33.3 fps
|
25% 31.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 107 107 101 105 MB/s
|
65.7%
Good
|
70% 96.6 MB/s
|
94% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
48.6%
Average
|
51% 17.7 GB/s
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
35% 115 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 47: 4R 5G 12B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47% | 23% | 93 | 199 | 21 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | AOC2200 2200W |
Typical empty Builds (Compare 554 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Empty empty
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 38x |
| Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 26x |
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 51x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |