Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 13:13
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 210
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 934
83% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,271
79% 1,271 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 1.5
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
25GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,320
Write 1,256
Mixed 1,376
364% 1,651 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 76.4
246% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 729
523% 680 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 36 86 62 60 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 283
Mixed 234
SusWrite 84.6
190% 257 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.2
939% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 148%
Great: 153%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
18GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 11 7.9 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 91.4
Write 70.1
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 10.1
67% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.2
217% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2Z3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 19.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP2956 HP ZR2440w
Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $879
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback