PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 10A6A068ZY (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO SHARKBAY |
Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131118 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 28 '21 at 12:55 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.7%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85C3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
INTENSO 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 380 407 396 394 286 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
900GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 173 173 172 171 171 MB/s
|
99.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46% | 59% | 27 | 327 | 253 | 60 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | QMX2421 Q24 |
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 2x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 1x |
SSD | |
---|---|
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples | 3x |
INTENSO 128GBBench 65%, 3,345 samples | 1x |
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $191 |