Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 139 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 201 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 1632) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.77 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.3 2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 385 363 375 383 370 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 442 Write 405 Mixed 306 SusWrite 373 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 20.6 71% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 158 169% 282 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5773DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB 372 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	40% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	50x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 2x4GBUnknownBench 33%, 208 samples	5x
16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 2x4GBUnknownBench 32%, 380 samples	5x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	4x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $194

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16