Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive496% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 01:03
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 169
2-Core 332
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,206
112% 935 Pts
64-Core 2,410
149% 2,410 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 251
Reflection 251
Parallax 519
205% 340 fps
MRender 287
Gravity 200
Splatting 288
214% 258 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 186%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3287 3341 3335 3381 3396 3408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
496% Outstanding
Read 2,959
Write 3,341
Mixed 2,976
SusWrite 3,358
714% 3,158 MB/s
4K Read 79.6
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 112
372% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,358
DQ Write 1,188
DQ Mixed 1,263
950% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 496%
Great: 526%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31100TNTD 1TB
136GB free
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 432 433 434 431 431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 179
Write 104
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 431
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 11.9
52% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 14.1
11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 103%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
241GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 424 424 426 388 401 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 433
Mixed 419
SusWrite 414
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 51.5
169% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 189
147% 202 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3355 3363 3360 3328 3360 3360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
477% Outstanding
Read 2,779
Write 3,315
Mixed 3,026
SusWrite 3,354
706% 3,119 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 89.4
324% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,440
DQ Write 1,316
DQ Mixed 1,380
1,034% 1,378 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 477%
Great: 526%
Adata SX 8200PNP 2TB
579GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 772 779 695 620 619 615 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R009D408GX2-4600C19A 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 40.7
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 43.2
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27.4" 1280 720 DELA179 Dell AW2721D
Typical X570 Taichi Razer Edition Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback