Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8150-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 110
53% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 417
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 410
28% 410 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$150
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 77.3
47% 65.1 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 44.5
48% 54.8 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 51%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
JOYSSD256 256GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 390
Write 290
Mixed 283
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 1.2
52% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 36.1
DQ Mixed 1.4
9% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB
588GB free
Firmware: JP4ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 65 122 121 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 100
Write 71.7
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 71.2
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$28
25GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 43.2
Mixed 33
29% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown M378B1G73AH0-K0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 15: 1R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 16% 31 108 6 60 32" 1920 1080 MST0030 MStar Demo
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 4,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback