Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190524
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '21 at 18:29
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64% Good	Memory 48.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 227 69% 131 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 448 61% 452 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.7% Below average	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 55 Parallax 48.1 44% 52.4 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 30.2 Splatting 42.6 31% 37.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 47 150 93 4 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 435 Write 397 Mixed 380 SusWrite 105 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.5 47% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 558GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 29 32 28 30 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 100 Write 100 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 48.9 58% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE1 1x8GB 364 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 5.1 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 40: 2R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
40%	32%	57	308	234	72	23.5"	1920 1080	SAM0D20 S24F350

History: Score 30: 4R 1G 7B | Score 40: 2R 7G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,863x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	862x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	188x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	459x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	391x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	356x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	510x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	238x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	200x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	496x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	165x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16