Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	90.5 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200915
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '21 at 09:13
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Memory 80.8 1-Core 151 2-Core 301 95% 178 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 1,168 105% 883 Pts	64-Core 2,155 133% 2,155 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 42.5 Parallax 39.4 31% 40.1 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 28.3 28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB 3,514 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 505 Write 462 Mixed 412 102% 460 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 53.7 178% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 203 153% 204 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 115%
Samsung MZPLJ3T2HBJR-00007 3TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 353% 2TB free Firmware: EPK9AB5Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2950 2945 2956 2906 2959 2953 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	391% Outstanding	Read 1660 Write 3,264 Mixed 1838 SusWrite 2,945 553% 2,427 MB/s	4K Read 53.5 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 80 274% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,413 DQ Write 1296 DQ Mixed 1,348 1,013% 1,352 MB/s
Poor: 279% ↑ This bench: 391% Great: 437%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 439GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 138 138 137 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 175 Write 170 Mixed 102 SusWrite 138 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 104%
WD WD101EFBX-68B0AN0 10TB 547 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 5.5TB free Firmware: 85.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 202 207 210 205 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 213 Mixed 127 SusWrite 202 136% 186 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.4 350% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 118%
WD WD80EFBX-68AZZN0 8TB 736 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 41GB free Firmware: 85.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 210 205 211 205 206 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 170 Mixed 128 SusWrite 207 125% 169 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 1.5 352% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 117%
Toshiba HDWG180 8TB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 142GB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 117 118 117 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 214 Write 208 Mixed 73 SusWrite 117 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 133%
WD WD120EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB 418 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 733GB free Firmware: 85.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 95 91 91 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 100 Write 108 Mixed 87.6 SusWrite 91.9 72% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 1.3 345% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3600 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX DDR4 3600 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 95GB 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	115% Outstanding	MC Read 45.7 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 41.6 122% 42.8 GB/s	SC Read 28.1 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 39.6 88% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 79.1 50% 79.1 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	75	24"	1280 720	SAM0F5E S24D332

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,135x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,715x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	912x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	880x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	697x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	275x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16