MSI MS-17F2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-17F2  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 12:55
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 272
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 756
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1283) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 89.6
Parallax 52
52% 68.3 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 49.9
40% 48.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 235 260 258 259 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 540
Write 554
Mixed 357
SusWrite 286
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 25.4
107% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 411
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 304
236% 326 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 126%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
778GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 113 113 111 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 96
Write 80.8
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 113
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
200% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 11.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 11
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 9R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 34% 59 305 206 120 17.3" 1920 1080 AUO479D
Typical MS-17F2 Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback