Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 02:12
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 1,193
109% 915 Pts
64-Core 1,159
72% 1,159 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 138
Parallax 291
116% 191 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 145
Splatting 173
149% 184 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1424 1176 472 595 598 599 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,999
Write 2,012
Mixed 1180
SusWrite 810
336% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 85.6
282% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,684
DQ Write 1,460
DQ Mixed 1,510
1,149% 1,551 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 287%
Great: 340%
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB
69GB free
Firmware: V4.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 434 435 432 435 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 446
Write 382
Mixed 329
SusWrite 417
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 24.2
125% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 37.3
75% 150 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
251GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 478 480 482 434 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 470
Mixed 407
SusWrite 451
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 57.9
192% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
384GB free
Firmware: GH2OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 119 119 118 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 120
Write 96.6
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 118
65% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
645GB free
Firmware: SBM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 113 119 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 48.8
Write 116
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 116
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 47.2
MC Mixed 31.2
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 48.4
SC Mixed 31.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 55.9
72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 113%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7017 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $788
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback