Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 129% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171201
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '21 at 01:05
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 122 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 805 76% 631 Pts	64-Core 1,048 65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 4069) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	153% Outstanding	Lighting 226 Reflection 209 Parallax 205 184% 213 fps	MRender 194 Gravity 156 Splatting 139 131% 163 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2075 Write 878 Mixed 447 246% 1,133 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 58.9 235% 92.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,213 DQ Write 1,078 DQ Mixed 715 654% 1002 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 189GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 138 140 139 137 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 171 Write 157 Mixed 98.2 SusWrite 135 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 102GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 90 94 94 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 156 Write 140 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 92.7 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 61GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 128 137 139 138 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 130 Write 133 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 135 77% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 22GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 27.2 Write 0.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.2 9% 9.33 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 20%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 160 157 153 156 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 147 Write 164 Mixed 107 SusWrite 157 197% 144 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.5 262% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4 2x8GB 669 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.7% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 18.9 64% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 49: 5R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
49%	48%	40	249	167	60	31.5"	2560 1440	SAM0F52 U32J59x

History: Score 43: 4R 5G 8B | Score 49: 5R 5G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,511x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	832x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	573x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	401x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	338x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	115x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16