Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateJun 25 '21 at 21:27
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 194
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 393
42% 328 Pts
64-Core 450
30% 450 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 50.3
24% 36.8 fps
MRender 47.2
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 54.2
41% 50.9 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 48%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7101Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 714 641 623 619 612 620 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 733
Write 1,013
Mixed 645
SusWrite 638
171% 757 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 62.7
183% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 581
DQ Mixed 680
504% 669 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 156%
Great: 285%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.6
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 24.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 120 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0FA Dell AW3418DW
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 6,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback