Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512DA
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191224
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '21 at 17:55
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 23,686 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 211 68% 125 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 539 56% 453 Pts	64-Core 545 34% 545 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 1821) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Lighting 13.8 Reflection 16 Parallax 18.3 11% 16 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 16.3 Splatting 10.7 10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 303GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 78 81 83 82 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 908 Write 925 Mixed 887 SusWrite 93.4 158% 703 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 2.4 122% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 16.5 DQ Write 51.5 DQ Mixed 32.4 25% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 185%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 659GB free Firmware: JU0C1J SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 119 117 120 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 141 Write 143 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 119 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 25.6 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 22.3 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	69	7	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE07F1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	404x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	94x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	41x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	405x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	94x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	41x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	189x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	77x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	66x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	90x
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 55%, 2,394 samples	84x
HMA851S6CJR6N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBHynixBench 51%, 539 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16