Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 16 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA560
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '21 at 17:14
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Memory 88.4 1-Core 144 2-Core 277 94% 170 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 804 84% 672 Pts	64-Core 942 58% 942 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop) 45,297 User benchmarks, average bench 114% Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.63 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	109% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 160 Parallax 136 116% 146 fps	MRender 157 Gravity 112 Splatting 110 102% 127 fps
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 127%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB 4,252 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1833 803 785 790 788 787 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 1,814 Write 1,880 Mixed 1,369 SusWrite 964 338% 1,507 MB/s	4K Read 49.4 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 56.9 205% 71.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,051 DQ Write 885 DQ Mixed 995 738% 977 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 297%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	82.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 23.9 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 24.6 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	165	15.5"	1280 720	CMN152A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	729x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	268x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	207x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	270x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	183x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	409x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	158x
TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GBUnknownBench 76%, 2,477 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16