Transtec CALLEO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTranstec CALLEO  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P10S-E Series
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, , , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160301
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 25 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 555
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 203B) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 30.4
25% 31.3 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 21.8
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB (2019)-$300
737GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102430WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 593 557 556 557 656 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 548
Write 536
Mixed 536
SusWrite 591
125% 553 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 53.2
189% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 967
680% 855 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 152%
Great: 320%
Apple HDD ST3000DM001 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: AP18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 161 154 159 163 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 134
Write 69.1
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 154
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
244GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 56.8
Mixed 45
SusWrite 65.2
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0E15 C27HG7x
Typical CALLEO Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Transtec CALLEO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 144% - Outstanding Total price: $230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback