Asus P5GC-MX/1333

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5GC-MX/1333  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '21 at 08:56
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 56.8
37% 52.1 Pts
4-Core 56.6
8-Core 56.7
8% 56.7 Pts
64-Core 56.8
4% 56.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 71 70 70 73 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41% Average
Read 73.2
Write 71.7
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 69.4
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5GC-MX/1333 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5GC-MX/1333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $141
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback