Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-142

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-142 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130422
Uptime	11 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '21 at 07:56
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Memory 78 1-Core 49.3 2-Core 86.2 47% 71.2 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 138 18% 135 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.77 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VC 256GB 959 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 181 175 166 161 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 416 Write 260 Mixed 127 SusWrite 176 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 22.3 71% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 126 116% 181 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 115%
Apacer AS350 128 128GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 119GB free Firmware: 5A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 305 315 301 308 312 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	46% Average	Read 308 Write 289 Mixed 267 SusWrite 304 66% 292 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 11.4 44% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 63.6 DQ Mixed 19.8 22% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.8% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 84.3 47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	50%	2	10	3	60	21.9"	1680 1050	SAM0C7B S22E450

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-142 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-142

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	4x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	4x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	4x
128G 128GBSSDBench 57%, 241 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-YK0 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 32%, 4 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	1x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16