Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E4E-S05CL
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131023
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '21 at 05:41
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 69.5 2-Core 108 55% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 168 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8600/8700M 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sanyo(144D C708) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.1034.6 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.55% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 13.5 7% 10.4 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 8.1 Splatting 6.8 6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.55% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 635GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX001F SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 83 91 94 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 96.9 Write 89.5 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 90.9 56% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 57%
Generic External 1TB 2,077 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 618GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 23.8 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 25.4 34% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AM1U16BC2P1-B1AC 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 6GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 14.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 4R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	16%	80	69	56	60	13.9"	1366 768	AUO193C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	41x
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	22x
Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples	21x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	75x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	24x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	5x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	14x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	13x
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 754 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16