Asus G11DF

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G11DF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11DF
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170601
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 18:13
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 69.2 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 176 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 456 50% 393 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.7% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 72.6 Parallax 63.9 48% 65.1 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 0.1 33% 45.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB 7,802 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4131002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 94 95 88 82 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 361 Write 125 Mixed 242 SusWrite 90.9 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 36.4 129% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 192 153% 218 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 1.5 3.3 4.3 4.6 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	7.24% Terrible	Read 21.1 Write 3.2 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 4.1 10% 9.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.6 130% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 14 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 5R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	24%	49	110	7	60	48.5"	1280 720	SAM0A7D SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11DF Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11DF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	40x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	20x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	14x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	22x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	16x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	7x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	27x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	17x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16