Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 155
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 283
33% 258 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 19.5
12% 20 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 19.9
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 385 392 398 397 409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 410
Write 37
Mixed 311
SusWrite 388
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 35.3
134% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 226
173% 229 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 88%
CT3500SC 500GB
336GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 55 54 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 50.9
Write 54.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 54.9
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
354GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 85 85 83 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 74.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 83.6
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V02D4L88GB1G81G82400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 19.7" 1280 720 LEN66A0 C19-10
Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $240
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback