Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150601
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 18:11
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 222 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 732 70% 581 Pts	64-Core 935 58% 935 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	162% Outstanding	Lighting 257 Reflection 239 Parallax 143 209% 213 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 142 Splatting 143 117% 143 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 502GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1331 1181 1127 1158 1169 1157 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1,791 Write 1693 Mixed 747 SusWrite 1,187 303% 1,355 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 50.2 177% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 856 DQ Write 608 DQ Mixed 763 561% 742 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 302%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 93GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 129 129 129 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 419 Write 132 Mixed 127 SusWrite 129 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 19.5 105% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 48.9 84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 73%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4GB free Firmware: 000F Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 418 Write 224 Mixed 266 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 14.1 91% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 23.2 44% 89 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 90GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 451 446 417 394 378 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 413 Mixed 315 SusWrite 423 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 38.9 137% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 150 167% 284 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 116%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 840GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 79 79 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 81.5 Write 70.8 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 78.2 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 83%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 1,626 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 56GB free, PID 00ed Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 24 24 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 101 Write 36.1 SusWrite 22.4 54% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 101% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 28%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 361GB free, PID 50a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 87 88 89 88 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 83.9 Write 86.9 Mixed 64 SusWrite 88.1 110% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.4% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 20.7 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 18.1 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	144	27"	1280 720	ACR06C1 XV272U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	55x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	6x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	7x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	6x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples	5x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 76%, 7,414 samples	5x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 1,630 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $439

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16