Asus EX-H110M-V

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus EX-H110M-V (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170825
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 18:02
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 51.6 2-Core 114 46% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 238 27% 213 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.97% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 6.6 8% 5.93 fps	MRender 14.9 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 11.1 10% 13.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 8.97% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB 1,678 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 16 13 17 18 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25% Poor	Read 249 Write 24.2 Mixed 15 SusWrite 16.9 16% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 6.7 40% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 87.1 DQ Write 21.1 DQ Mixed 26.4 27% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 16GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 10 8.5 9.9 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 19.2 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 10.9 22% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 28% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL17-17-17 D4-2400 1x8GB 990 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.8% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 7.6 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.1 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 35: 3R 6G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
35%	37%	30	40	20	60	23"	1920 1080	AUS23CC VZ239

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-H110M-V Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H110M-V

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	79x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	71x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	45x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x

RAM
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GBTeamBench 41%, 3,973 samples	7x
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	5x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $261	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16