PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A36 |
Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170622 |
Uptime | 7 Days |
Run Date | Jun 24 '21 at 16:34 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
54.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
543GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 127 121 120 133 MB/s
|
67.1%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
41% | 20% | 83 | 216 | 72 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | PHLC0CF PHL 223V5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 125x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 61x |
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 109x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 50x |
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $192 |