Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 15:34
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 630
61% 502 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 3996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.4% Good
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 93.2
Parallax 83
69% 86.8 fps
MRender 82.5
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 76.3
65% 79.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 218 215 207 206 213 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 470
Mixed 390
SusWrite 256
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 52.7
174% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
322GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 171 173 172 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 130
Mixed 92
SusWrite 172
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
258GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 78 79 79 80 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 90.8
Mixed 70
SusWrite 76.2
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 40.3
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 21.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 105%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 22% 36 111 6 60 27" 1920 1080 ACI27A1 VS278
Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,193
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback