Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FLC_X512FL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FLC_X512FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FLC
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 15:08
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 25%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 60.6
40% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 86.5
8-Core 132
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 15DF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3153
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 19.3
13% 18 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 0.3
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 250GB SSD 250GB
22GB free
Firmware: S0614B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,368
Write 1,099
Mixed 922
251% 1,129 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 38
161% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 247
198% 280 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 209%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 45 56 56 35 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 40.5
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.4
128% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 04CD F4-2666C19-8GRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 18.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0046
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FLC_X512FL Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FLC_X512FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback