Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	43.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170905
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 05:27
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 62.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 217 71% 131 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 884 79% 665 Pts	64-Core 2,176 135% 2,176 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 35.7 28% 36.5 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 26.3 26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 609 262 260 257 256 255 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,634 Write 1,517 Mixed 640 SusWrite 317 228% 1,027 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 94.8 4K Mixed 46.6 167% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 846 DQ Write 610 DQ Mixed 713 537% 723 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 254%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 218% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1971 1772 1562 1477 1437 1386 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 805 Write 1,788 Mixed 674 SusWrite 1,601 277% 1,217 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 28.9 98% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 515 DQ Mixed 337 283% 405 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 397%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 219GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 153 151 148 151 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 329 Write 270 Mixed 270 SusWrite 151 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 38.1 120% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 145 110% 148 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 135%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 88GB free Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 137 134 136 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 301 Write 240 Mixed 266 SusWrite 134 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 30.1 97% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 147 111% 149 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 99%
Amd-raid Array 2 6TB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 299 297 297 296 299 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 286 Write 229 Mixed 136 SusWrite 290 172% 235 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.7 332% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 199%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 126 126 130 132 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 64.9 Write 87.5 Mixed 93.9 SusWrite 127 70% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 332% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4A2666C16 4x16GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 41 MC Write 38.5 MC Mixed 43.8 117% 41.1 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 19 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 30: 4R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
30%	9%	115	159	103	60	26"	2560 1440	AOC2410 AG241QG4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16