PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7A72 |
Motherboard | MSI H270 PC MATE (MS-7A72) (all builds) |
Memory | 54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170406 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jun 24 '21 at 04:23 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
80GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 373 378 380 377 374 MB/s
|
99.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 122 45 57 117 MB/s
|
79.1%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65.4%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 74 | 5 | 60 | 31.5" | 2560 1440 | SAM0F53 C32JG5x |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 127x |
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 69x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 69x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 81x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 53x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $414 |