Monster TULPAR T5 V20.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V20.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V20.1
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 22:10
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 131 2-Core 230 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 626 63% 510 Pts	64-Core 763 47% 763 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1097) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 130 Parallax 7.3 4% 47.5 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 8.8 7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB 7,447 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,311 Write 1,521 Mixed 1,614 402% 1,815 MB/s	4K Read 54 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 68.6 226% 76.5 MB/s	DQ Read 926 DQ Write 658 DQ Mixed 770 581% 785 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 316%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 393GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 88 88 88 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 71.3 Write 37.3 Mixed 46.4 SusWrite 87 80% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.4% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 20.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 19.7 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 58: 8R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
58%	31%	45	273	182	144	15.5"	1536 864	BOE0804

History: Score 42: 5R 3G 8B | Score 38: 4R 2G 12B | Score 58: 8R 6G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V20.1 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V20.1

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	105x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	55x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	50x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 7,447 samples	18x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	10x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	10x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	43x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 49%, 13,312 samples	18x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16