Lenovo F0B100DHLD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0B100DHLD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO CRESCENTBAY
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 19:27
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 37.7
1-Core 50.8
2-Core 55.1
30% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 119
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 361D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 5
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM05H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 273
Mixed 230
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 12.7
58% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 122
93% 129 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6DFR8A-PB HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 23.5" 1280 720 LEN8000 LBG AIO PC
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback