Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
7 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 17:37
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$300
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
103% 183 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 944
99% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,161
78% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0783) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 60.7
Parallax 72.2
44% 62.3 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 55.5
44% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 154 155 158 150 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 478
Write 253
Mixed 163
SusWrite 162
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 33.2
143% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 119
126% 211 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 101%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$34
54GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 212 65 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 496
Write 342
Mixed 362
SusWrite 146
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 33.4
144% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 167
152% 228 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 90%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 165 166 164 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 150
Write 124
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 163
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 90%
Great: 117%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
25GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 10 9.8 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 19.1
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 11.4
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 2.8
250% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 18%
AS Mass Storage 32GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 14 17 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 23.9
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 17
23% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.7
104% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 33.1
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 52.3
SC Mixed 33.7
103% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 115%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 55: 6R 8G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 19% 79 350 290 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACI24C3 ASUS VN247
History: Score 28: 4R 1G 5B | Score 55: 6R 8G 1B
Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 5,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $1,820
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback