Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 17:13
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 377
45% 348 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 7.1
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF192HCGS-000L1 192GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT21L5Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 126 108 115 123 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 314
Write 125
Mixed 162
SusWrite 123
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 13.4
45% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 45.9
DQ Mixed 62.6
58% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
400GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 119 121 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 121
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 103 104 104 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 104
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 109%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
495GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 50.3
Write 76.7
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 85
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 99 102 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 61.4
Write 80.6
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 95.5
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 3R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 28% 32 67 46 60 34.8" 1360 768 ELE0000 ELEFW328
History: Score 15: 0R 5G 0B | Score 31: 3R 5G 1B
Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback