Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 16:32
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$420
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 86.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 1,064
99% 802 Pts
64-Core 2,175
146% 2,175 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$790
Nvidia(10DE 1302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 212
Parallax 126
109% 158 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 149
Splatting 124
125% 153 fps
Poor: 110%
This bench: 117%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 811 499 502 499 489 489 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,263
Write 2,409
Mixed 1,914
SusWrite 548
400% 1,783 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 78.2
258% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 1,052
787% 1,051 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 251%
Great: 387%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$160
931GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3906 3968 3969 3972 3964 3963 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
470% Outstanding
Read 2,303
Write 3,611
Mixed 2,314
SusWrite 3,957
692% 3,046 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 84.9
286% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1177
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1,077
804% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 470%
Great: 484%
3 2TB SSD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: T0617A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 423 422 422 422 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 404
Mixed 389
SusWrite 423
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 32.4
132% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 49
64% 113 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 0 26 115 212 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$120
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 159 159 162 161 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 89.7
Write 92.4
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 158
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
251% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 139 135 136 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 107
Write 99.9
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 139
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$173
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 150 146 149 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 95
Write 129
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 150
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
222% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 119 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 77.5
Write 112
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 123
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
193% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.1 4.3 4.1 3.8 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 7
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 4.2
13% 13 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.9
180% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial Ballistix Elite DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB-$250
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 45
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.4
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 125%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 4 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7953 BenQ EW2780U
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 23,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,087
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $360Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback