Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 15:54
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 65.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 217 71% 130 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 602 60% 492 Pts	64-Core 574 36% 574 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 17C1) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Lighting 15.3 Reflection 29.1 Parallax 21.1 12% 21.8 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 16.5 Splatting 13.6 12% 14 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 426 426 426 428 428 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1183 Write 1,150 Mixed 1,003 SusWrite 453 212% 947 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 59.7 200% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 857 DQ Write 657 DQ Mixed 726 551% 747 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 187%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 483GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 457 452 463 464 463 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 460 Mixed 431 SusWrite 455 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 72 4K Mixed 47.9 154% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 247 185% 246 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G32C16S4B.M8FE 2x8GB 820 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.3% Excellent	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 26.6 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 32.4 SC Mixed 22.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	15.5"	1280 720	NCP002D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	581x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	484x
Radeon RX 560XAMDBench 21%, 4,290 samples	93x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	2x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	116x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	97x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	49x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	109x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	50x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16