Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 15:00
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 93
2-Core 184
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 347
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.8% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 32.6
26% 33.1 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 23.3
16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D110225a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 33 24 63 28 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 204
Write 53.8
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 43.3
19% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 11.9
44% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 23.9
DQ Mixed 11.1
10% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 30%
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
29GB free
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 134 119 117 85 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 468
Write 255
Mixed 325
SusWrite 152
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 36.6
150% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 185
161% 238 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 85 90 88 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 83.8
Write 83.7
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 89.2
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 0420 M378B5673FH0-CH9 1317 OCZ3OB1600LV2G 8GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 4R 8G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 30% 67 176 25 60 24" 1920 1080 AUS24A1 VG245
History: Score 26: 4R 1G 3B | Score 52: 4R 8G 8B
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback