Galax H310M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGalax H310M  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAX H310M
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200219
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 13:00
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 259
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 505
67% 502 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4028) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3504 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 53.7
45% 55.6 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 46.8
45% 56.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 18 60 72 31 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.6% Poor
Read 200
Write 98.2
Mixed 103
SusWrite 40.1
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 5
48% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 41.9
DQ Write 36.4
DQ Mixed 33.2
26% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
544GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 142 154 155 156 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 160
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 152
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 6R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 62% 16 224 56 60 20" 1366 768 GSM4EE1 20EN33
History: Score 44: 5R 3G 10B | Score 40: 6R 3G 1B
Typical H310M Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Galax H310M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback