Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit, Χρώματα 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 12:29
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$175
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 155
71% 114 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 529
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 758
51% 758 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$220
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 22.8
8% 14.1 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 46.8
Splatting 8.1
32% 19.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$78
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 941 677 672 671 660 655 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,427
Write 2,059
Mixed 1,714
SusWrite 712
386% 1,728 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 69
234% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 665
480% 627 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 240%
Great: 335%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
245GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 82 69 102 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 113
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 96.3
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.6
320% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 138%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
305GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 79 80 79 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 83.2
Write 78
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 79.2
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$73
19GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 90 91 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 181
Write 165
Mixed 125
SusWrite 89.7
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 109%
SDHC Card 8GB
5GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Read 11
Write 10.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 10.8
12% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 20
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 25" 1280 720 DELD06E DELL U2515H
Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $949
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback