Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 09:22
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 68.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 283
85% 162 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 969
89% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,719
106% 1,719 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 197
Parallax 224
164% 207 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 203
Splatting 152
161% 203 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 150%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
475GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 890 499 500 492 483 458 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
629GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 436 435 436 435 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 421
Mixed 390
SusWrite 436
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 49.3
173% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
266GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 436 436 437 435 437 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 421
Mixed 394
SusWrite 436
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 50.7
175% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
486GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 1237 1234 1233 1221 1228 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1959
Write 1529
Mixed 1,462
SusWrite 1231
346% 1,545 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 74.9
255% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1,060
796% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 280%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2092 2079 2085 1982 1503 1519 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,128
Write 2,394
Mixed 1,685
SusWrite 1,877
456% 2021 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 71.9
256% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 992
DQ Mixed 1,043
788% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 326%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 26.3
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 9.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELF017 DELL U2410
Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $536
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback