Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 07:54
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 251
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 755
76% 618 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Asus(1043 86E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.2% Good
Lighting 88.6
Reflection 122
Parallax 78.1
72% 96.3 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 73.3
60% 73.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B180119a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 25 69 31 32 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 457
Write 31.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 40.4
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 28.1
102% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 48.7
DQ Mixed 62.4
50% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
688GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 179 179 178 175 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 163
Mixed 87
SusWrite 177
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Adata HM900 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 171 170 173 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 168
Mixed 112
SusWrite 171
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL17-17-17 D4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 14.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 10.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 3 1 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP2952 HP ZR2240w
Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback