PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180326 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 23 '21 at 07:05 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.77
|
8.27%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 138 149 131 150 150 MB/s
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 9.2 8.7 8.8 8.9 MB/s
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
40%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | PHLC0CF PHL 223V5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 222x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 175x |
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 143x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 207x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 108x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 100x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $548 |