Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock B560M-C (all builds)
Memory	19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 02:08
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10105F 14,843 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 132 2-Core 247 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 635 68% 539 Pts	64-Core 651 40% 651 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36D1) CLim: 1508 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 21 Parallax 23.9 20% 23.2 fps	MRender 28.5 Gravity 26.5 Splatting 19.2 20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 185 146 133 201 134 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 430 Mixed 281 SusWrite 182 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 39 151% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 149 167% 283 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 111%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 219GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 66 67 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 63.7 Write 63.4 Mixed 44 SusWrite 67.4 44% 59.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hewlett-Packard 8MG00AA# 8MG00AA# Gold Key Co Ltd NMUD480E85-3000D 24GB 2667, 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.5% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 23.2 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 23.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 49: 7R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
49%	16%	109	210	116	60	34.8"	1920 1080	WET0154

History: Score 37: 4R 4G 5B | Score 49: 7R 2G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 3,974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

CPU
Core i7-11700FIntelBench 98%, 21,161 samples	1,225x
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	962x
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	411x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	858x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	526x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	395x

SSD
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 217%, 23,579 samples	381x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	376x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	300x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	376x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	350x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	231x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $270

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16