HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 01:34
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3667U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 122
59% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 206
28% 203 Pts
64-Core 198
13% 198 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 60%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 248 250 253 243 229 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 365
Write 256
Mixed 213
SusWrite 244
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 19.3
67% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 126
105% 156 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 17: 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 3% 149 18 11 40 0" 1366 768
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 17: 2R 2G 1B
Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 1,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback