Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 00:19
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 79.3 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 97.3 48% 75.1 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 252 26% 209 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3527) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 23.5 Parallax 18 13% 19.3 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 18.2 Splatting 16.7 16% 20 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF12 128GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSTA SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 189 274 222 246 315 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.4% Above average	Read 249 Write 130 Mixed 226 SusWrite 243 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 32.8 92% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 64.5 DQ Mixed 32.2 29% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 87%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 233GB free Firmware: 4.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 93 95 91 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 93.9 Write 68.3 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 91.3 54% 74.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.M16F CT51264BA1339.M16F CT51264BA1339.M16F 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	32"	1280 701	MST0030 MStar Demo

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	22x

GPU
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	7x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x

RAM
99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF Team--Elite-133300 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 4 samples	3x
M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 18GBNanyaBench 27%, 6 samples	3x
DDR3 2000G DDR3 2000G Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF 12GBAdataBench 27%, 9 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16