Asrock Z97 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Killer  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime12.8 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 23:41
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 434
57% 430 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 92.3
57% 74.1 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 47.2
49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,558
Write 6,446
Mixed 6,325
1,440% 6443 MB/s
4K Read 393
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 311
1,136% 324 MB/s
DQ Read 1,224
DQ Write 1,103
DQ Mixed 1,098
842% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 122%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
207GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 277 275 276 276 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 279
Mixed 325
SusWrite 300
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 47.9
164% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 234
211% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 118%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
48GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 143
Write 30.9
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 30.6
71% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.6
182% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 27.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 32" 1280 720 SPT0CC6 Sceptre Q32
Typical Z97 Killer Builds (Compare 1,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Killer - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $805
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback