Asus STRIX B250F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX B250F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 22:42
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium G4600-$136
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 213
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 190
13% 190 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 106
Parallax 96.6
82% 101 fps
MRender 89.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 0.3
80% 64 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 12 43 15 35 3.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 118
Write 84.1
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 30.7
18% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 13.9
50% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 49.7
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 84.1
58% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$45
84GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 117 115 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 73
SusWrite 114
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721680PLA380 80GB-$41
40GB free
Firmware: P21OABBA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 61 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 46.2
Write 45.5
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 61.8
33% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 40%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 40 41 40 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 35.6
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 39.1
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
137% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
41GB free, PID b202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 102 105 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 101
Write 92
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 102
109% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 47: 4R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 17% 109 228 94 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACR0098 X223HQ
Typical STRIX B250F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX B250F GAMING - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $832
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback