Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA550
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 22:36
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 148 2-Core 290 98% 177 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 812 85% 681 Pts	64-Core 994 62% 994 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1A58 2011) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5155 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61% Good	Lighting 73.2 Reflection 105 Parallax 64.5 60% 80.8 fps	MRender 89.3 Gravity 76.6 Splatting 70.5 64% 78.8 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GB 3,806 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXH7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1224 408 409 406 408 410 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,410 Write 2,036 Mixed 942 SusWrite 544 277% 1,233 MB/s	4K Read 56.4 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 71.6 234% 78.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,004 DQ Write 820 DQ Mixed 960 706% 928 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 261%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 323GB free Firmware: EDFM20.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1237 585 386 390 365 364 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 999 Write 988 Mixed 892 SusWrite 554 193% 859 MB/s	4K Read 48.4 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 68.4 235% 85.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,156 DQ Write 957 DQ Mixed 1,038 782% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 291%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 23.9 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 39.1 SC Mixed 27 81% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 57.8 69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	144	15.5"	1280 720	BOE0804

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	2,024x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	849x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	564x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	488x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	425x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	409x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	165x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	1,057x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	254x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	223x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16