Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 996
97% 773 Pts
64-Core 1422
95% 1422 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 87E1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 36.1
22% 28.2 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 23.7
21% 22 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 18%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$68
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EB Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 639 480 494 486 487 480 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,645
Write 1,918
Mixed 1,560
SusWrite 511
368% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 76.9
254% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 59.1
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 236
138% 139 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 221%
Great: 313%
WD Purple Surveillance 3TB (2017)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 151 152 151 151 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 179
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 151
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
PNY 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 30.2
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 22.9
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 27.6" 1280 720 SAM0C3C SAMSUNG
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 1,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $670
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback